My co-worker showed me this website she found. It is a cover photo of Faith Hill on an issue of Redbook magazine. They show you the before and after effects of editing a photo. It is amazing the difference. Here is the link: http://jezebel.com/gossip/photoshop-of-horrors/heres-our-winner-redbook-shatters-our-faith-in-well-not-publishing-but-maybe-god-278919.php
Just by looking at the pictures and the difference pretty much proves that even what you see in the magazines and on TV is edited. Those beautiful people are not as "perfect" as they make them. Although I still believe that Faith Hill is beautiful as is, and yet they went in and changed her. Some of her bone structure was even changed.
I think my favorite is when Jamie Lee Curtis was on the cover of More Magazine in Sept. 2002. They did a photo shoot of her as she really is and then after she "gets some help." It shows what she truly looks like under all of the hair, make-up and wardrobe. I have a lot of respect for her after this magazine issue came out. Here is the link: http://www.lhj.com/lhj/story.jhtml?storyid=/templatedata/lhj/story/data/jamieleecurtistruethighs_08212002.xml
I believe that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and people need to stop modifing themselves.
1 comment:
I was watching Ugly Betty and one of the episode delt with an actress that got her photo retouched. They basically took her photo and photoshopped it right in front of her. She was not pleased but at the end she end up having her untouched picture featured.
Post a Comment